Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Queer Quota Quintidi
Wisdom and Knowledge:
Action,
Bacon,
Cymbals Eat Guitars,
fall,
intellectual slavery,
scooters,
STREET TALENT,
Tits,
vacation
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
New Dream
Dreamt last night that me and some others ended up "back in time".
It was 1967, or maybe earlier and hipper. I was excited, because it was an opportunity for me to really put my knowledge of history to good use (ie, to my benefit). There was a group of us that went back in time, people I knew, but didn't, y'know?
I remember hassling, in the lightest sense of the word, some dude about weed, or liquor, only to have him reply that he was in to this new drug, LSD. So naturally I tried to suss out some of that instead.
There was another dude, doing other things, and I don't remember.
There was a woman who came back, and made the mistake of falling in love, and getting knocked up.
For some reason I have an image of a sunny day, on a golf course. Otherwise it's all hanging out inside with dim lights, like a smoking den, all orange and auburn.
I'm not convinced that this didn't really happen in some capacity.
It was 1967, or maybe earlier and hipper. I was excited, because it was an opportunity for me to really put my knowledge of history to good use (ie, to my benefit). There was a group of us that went back in time, people I knew, but didn't, y'know?
I remember hassling, in the lightest sense of the word, some dude about weed, or liquor, only to have him reply that he was in to this new drug, LSD. So naturally I tried to suss out some of that instead.
There was another dude, doing other things, and I don't remember.
There was a woman who came back, and made the mistake of falling in love, and getting knocked up.
For some reason I have an image of a sunny day, on a golf course. Otherwise it's all hanging out inside with dim lights, like a smoking den, all orange and auburn.
I'm not convinced that this didn't really happen in some capacity.
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Saturday, April 8, 1962
Saturday, April 8, 1962
In our conversations, don Juan consistently used or referred to the phrase "man of knowledge," but never explained what he meant by it. I asked him about it.
"A man of knowledge is one who has followed truthfully the hardships of learning," he said. "A man who has, without rushing or without faltering, gone as far as he can in unraveling the secrets of power and knowledge."
"Can anyone be a man of knowledge?"
"No, not anyone."
"Then what must a man do to become a man of knowledge?"
"He must challenge and defeat his four natural enemies."
"Will he be a man of knowledge after defeating these four enemies?"
"Yes. A man can call himself a man of knowledge only if he is capable of defeating all four of them."
"Then, can anybody who defeats these enemies be a man of knowledge?"
"Anybody who defeats them becomes a man of knowledge."
"But are there any special requirements a man must fulfill before fighting with these enemies?"
"No. Anyone can try to become a man of knowledge; very few men actually succeed, but that is only natural. The enemies a man encounters on the path of learning to become a man of knowledge are truly formidable; most men succumb to them."
"What kind of enemies are they, don Juan?"
He refused to talk about the enemies. He said it would be a long time before the subject would make any sense to me. I tried to keep the topic alive and asked him if he thought I could become a man of knowledge. He said no man could possibly tell that for sure. But I insisted on knowing if there were any clues he could use to determine whether or not I had a chance of becoming a man of knowledge. He said it would depend on my battle against the four enemies—whether I could defeat them or would be defeated by them—but it was impossible to foretell the outcome of that fight.
I asked him if he could use witchcraft or divination to see the outcome of the battle. He flatly stated that the results of the struggle could not be foreseen by any means, because becoming a man of knowledge was a temporary thing. When I asked him to explain that point, he replied:
"To be a man of knowledge has no permanence. One is never a man of knowledge, not really. Rather, one becomes a man of knowledge for a very brief instant, after defeating the four natural enemies."
"You must tell me, don Juan, what kind of enemies they are." He did not answer. I insisted again, but he dropped the subject and started to talk about something else.
"A man of knowledge is one who has followed truthfully the hardships of learning," he said. "A man who has, without rushing or without faltering, gone as far as he can in unraveling the secrets of power and knowledge."
"Can anyone be a man of knowledge?"
"No, not anyone."
"Then what must a man do to become a man of knowledge?"
"He must challenge and defeat his four natural enemies."
"Will he be a man of knowledge after defeating these four enemies?"
"Yes. A man can call himself a man of knowledge only if he is capable of defeating all four of them."
"Then, can anybody who defeats these enemies be a man of knowledge?"
"Anybody who defeats them becomes a man of knowledge."
"But are there any special requirements a man must fulfill before fighting with these enemies?"
"No. Anyone can try to become a man of knowledge; very few men actually succeed, but that is only natural. The enemies a man encounters on the path of learning to become a man of knowledge are truly formidable; most men succumb to them."
"What kind of enemies are they, don Juan?"
He refused to talk about the enemies. He said it would be a long time before the subject would make any sense to me. I tried to keep the topic alive and asked him if he thought I could become a man of knowledge. He said no man could possibly tell that for sure. But I insisted on knowing if there were any clues he could use to determine whether or not I had a chance of becoming a man of knowledge. He said it would depend on my battle against the four enemies—whether I could defeat them or would be defeated by them—but it was impossible to foretell the outcome of that fight.
I asked him if he could use witchcraft or divination to see the outcome of the battle. He flatly stated that the results of the struggle could not be foreseen by any means, because becoming a man of knowledge was a temporary thing. When I asked him to explain that point, he replied:
"To be a man of knowledge has no permanence. One is never a man of knowledge, not really. Rather, one becomes a man of knowledge for a very brief instant, after defeating the four natural enemies."
"You must tell me, don Juan, what kind of enemies they are." He did not answer. I insisted again, but he dropped the subject and started to talk about something else.
Wisdom and Knowledge:
Hey Umu add some appropriate labels to this you lazy asshole
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Wisdom and Knowledge:
acid,
fall,
Leonard Mustafa Kemal Ataturk Nimoy,
Mushrooms,
nat pwe,
polyamory,
scooters,
Underpants Party,
vacation,
Your Mom's Tears
Saturday, May 22, 2010
God is Love: An important message
Wisdom and Knowledge:
fall,
God,
Great Satan,
scooters,
spiritual revelation,
the war between me and faggot,
vacation,
Westboro Baptist Church
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Maxims and minims for the wise and the foolish
- I think that historians are talking nonsense, because they don't write their essays in Coq. — Umunmutamku
- LANGUAGE IS A HIERARCHICAL AUTHORITY
A GOVERNMENT OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS — Tezcatlipoca - Whoever fights against the empire, becomes the empire. [or something along those lines] — Philip K. Dick [as told to Tezcatlipoca]
- We’re not fighting the empire! We are the empire! Go away, or we'll smack you with this stick! — Tezcatlipoca
- You don't have to be straight to shoot straight. — Barry Goldwater
- Indeed, we must prevent life, which is frequently fatal. — Umunmutamku
- There are also a number of legitimate scientific reasons for it as well (though I don't know what they are) — Tezcatlipoca
- Indeed, we must prevent life, which is frequently fatal. — Umunmutamku
- Instead of thinking of Scripture as a manual, I try to think of the Bible as ‘a boyfriend’. — punkrainbow
- Your feelings are lying to you. — Jer 17:9
- READ A BOOK, I'M SURE IT'S IN ONE OF THEM. — Tezcatlipoca
- Books are full of bullshit and lies! — Tezcatlipoca
- We will lie to you but we will lie to ourselves as well. You will, however, see through our lies and grasp the shining truth within. — The KLF
- Books are full of bullshit and lies! — Tezcatlipoca
- A Gnostic is by definition a knower, and since knowledge supersedes belief, a knower cannot very well be a believer. — Stephan A. Hoeller
- talking about the great unknown is ridiculous. it’s THE GREAT UN-FUCKING-KNOWN — Anonymous
- The enemy knows the system. — Claude Shannon
Qadutu: Militant Queer Calculus
A mature leader of unwavering ethics and indisputable authority.
Better than having cock-holes in the middle of your face.
A mature leader of unwavering ethics and indisputable authority.
Better than having cock-holes in the middle of your face.
GROUP SEX - "DON'T KNOCK IT 'TILL YOU'VE TRIED IT"
- HYPERABOLITIONIST
- Better fonts so you can read this!
- WHAT'S WITH THE DATES HOMES
- beneaththecastle
- Scrapbooker Photos
- Scrapbooker on Myspace
- OMG! BEST PHOTOGRAPHER EVER!
- Bayonets!!!
- Faye Kane's Astronomy/Physics Fuck Blog
- DARK PIZZA
- њомкљу
- il gattopardo
- Dangereus Music
- MORE DANGEREUS
- abortionst. blog
- Listening as a Spectator Sport
- schelske
Contributors
secrets and lies for the un-initiated
GADGET GADGET GADGET
YOUR MOM IS A GADGET
AND I FUCK IT
MOSURALALALAND
MOTH, ER, LAND = MOTHER LAND
CHRISTOS ANESTI
CHRISTOS ANESTI




